Tuesday, July 25, 2017
The Mechanics of Abuse
I do not understand how women (or men or children) kill their abusers frankly. It elevates them to a position they do not deserve. I would not go to prison for any man or woman. Would you be willing to go to prison for killing a mosquito or cockroach? Why then would you be willing to ruin your future for an abusive man or woman?
Wednesday, July 12, 2017
The Essential Tragedy of Romantic Love
I have come very late to a tragic and rather horrible realisation: that we do no one a service when we fall in love with some one for his/her potential, recognising something in that person that no one else can see or value. You cannot force any one to realise potential. Every one has fatal flaws and if you do not accept THOSE, a relationship is based always on fantasy and misperception rather than truth.
I always wished to believe that every man was capable of becoming a true hero and that, if only I believed in him, he would take the high and difficult path to become the best person he could be. I fancied somehow that, like the audience in 'Peter Pan', if I shouted 'I believe in fairies! I do! I do!' hard enough and long enough, the hero would emerge from the chrysalis of the misshapen caterpillar or worm.
This is not a good way to fall in love nor is it a good basis for a relationship. Some one always feels he/she has been disappointed or actively 'let down'. Either the man, if you fail to somehow pull him up by his bootstraps to drag him into the higher realm or you, if you do your best and then are failed by the object of your love.
Better to recognise all the flaws initially. Better to look coldly and clearly at all the pros and cons of the existing person and not ride the thermals of fantasy to see what spirals might take both of you to a different reality together.
People seldom change. I am not speaking here of material wealth or position. Yes, you can be a helpmate in life and you can be an inspiration for some one to strive harder or gain a higher position or more wealth if that matters to you. I am speaking of character. When one falls in love, it usually has something to do with personality and character, shared dreams or aspirations or an illusion of the same. Sexual love is something else entirely and although it can wreak lives as often as romantic love, it at least is more clearly understood perhaps. It often is said that Western civilisation did every one a terrible disservice by attempting to combine romantic and sexual love when the two can be worlds apart. I always did feel that ideally, an arranged marriage based on commonality of interest and aspirations probably was kinder, more practical and less doomed to disaster than marriages based on partners we ourselves choose according to whim or hormones or some deep-seated illusionary primciples.
I always wished to believe that every man was capable of becoming a true hero and that, if only I believed in him, he would take the high and difficult path to become the best person he could be. I fancied somehow that, like the audience in 'Peter Pan', if I shouted 'I believe in fairies! I do! I do!' hard enough and long enough, the hero would emerge from the chrysalis of the misshapen caterpillar or worm.
This is not a good way to fall in love nor is it a good basis for a relationship. Some one always feels he/she has been disappointed or actively 'let down'. Either the man, if you fail to somehow pull him up by his bootstraps to drag him into the higher realm or you, if you do your best and then are failed by the object of your love.
Better to recognise all the flaws initially. Better to look coldly and clearly at all the pros and cons of the existing person and not ride the thermals of fantasy to see what spirals might take both of you to a different reality together.
People seldom change. I am not speaking here of material wealth or position. Yes, you can be a helpmate in life and you can be an inspiration for some one to strive harder or gain a higher position or more wealth if that matters to you. I am speaking of character. When one falls in love, it usually has something to do with personality and character, shared dreams or aspirations or an illusion of the same. Sexual love is something else entirely and although it can wreak lives as often as romantic love, it at least is more clearly understood perhaps. It often is said that Western civilisation did every one a terrible disservice by attempting to combine romantic and sexual love when the two can be worlds apart. I always did feel that ideally, an arranged marriage based on commonality of interest and aspirations probably was kinder, more practical and less doomed to disaster than marriages based on partners we ourselves choose according to whim or hormones or some deep-seated illusionary primciples.
Wednesday, July 5, 2017
Spirituality of the Old North and Death by Hanging
'The Vikings', a recent series made by the so-called 'History Channel' has many fine points and undoubtedly has made thousands of individuals in the early 21st century aware of the name and fame of the old Viking hero, Ragnar Lodbrok.
I am not that bothered by historical inaccuracies for the most part. They alter events in the interest of time and drama. What bothers me a little is the depiction of the religion of the Old North.
Last night, I watched the sacrifice made by Queen Lagertha wherein she used a curved scimitar to cut a beautiful young man through the breastbone.
There were a few elements of this that bothered me.
First of all, the God who was followed by most Warriors would have been Odhinn, whose method of sacrifice, including the sacrifice of Himself was hanging. The young man in this scene stands between two poles. He holds thongs or ropes on each of the poles but this is nothing like the old descriptions of sacrifice to Odhinn.
There are many bodies in museums that show ritual death by hanging and then placement in a body of water, usually a bog.
I do tend to subscribe to the theory that the Aesir were foreign invaders from the far East who brought their rites with them and that the Vanir were the native agrarian gods. Odhinn and Thor were members of the Aesir family of gods. Freyja, Freyr and Frigga were members of the Vanir.
Based on mystery religions throughout the world, I have come to the conclusion that one of the sacrificial rites practiced by followers of the Vanir would have been ritual castration. The Edda tells of Freyr's own sacrifice to the Giantess Gerd as a condition of his sacred marriage to her. The Giants were one of the elder races, powerful and primitive, equal to the Gods in their own way.
Freyr looked to the North and when he beheld the 'gleaming arms' of the beautiful giantess Gerd, he fell in love with her to the point where he became ill. He did not eat, drink or sleep. He journeyed north to her dwelling and she made it a condition of the marriage that he surrender his 'sword' to her.
One of the most ancient of mystery religions is that of the goddess Cybele and Attis. Cybele is, like Gerd, an ancient and powerful Goddess who dwells within the mountain, cave or rock. The traditional sacrifice to Cybele was voluntary castration. The man to be sacrificed would be bound to an evergreen, usually a pine tree, and then would have his genitals severed. He would become the tree and like the evergreen, which never loses its needles, would be reborn.
As in many Native American tribal traditions, the sacrifice of the male genitals was a means to gain freedom from gender. The individual then could be androgynous, neither man nor woman. Often the priests in Native American tribes, especially those of the Plains, would dress as women after this.
It is sad to me that the West has lost much of its focus in terms of the priority that once was given to spiritual gains above mere sexual gratification. Whenever I hear about individuals who want this or that in terms of 'gender' or 'sexual orientation', spiritual gains NEVER are mentioned. They want orgasms and a lifestyle that somehow satisfies them on a physical level, for whatever reason. The old sacrifices of genitalia or gender to the Mother Goddess were not an attempt to gain some sort of sexual climax at any price. They were 'sacrifices', something given for something greater. Attis died and was reborn through castration as were Adonis and the other gods of the ancient Fertile Crescent.
Some say that Heliogabalus or Elagabalus actually was an intensely spiritual follower of the ancient Mysteries... his name and reputation were blackened by the scurrilous political 'history' written about him and the other later Emperors. What was perceived as wanton lawless sexual behaviour may have been legitimate 'Eastern' practices.
Here is a link to the original text in English translation:
History of Elagabalus
More on this later.
In a very different sort of sacrifice, Odhinn hanged himself from the world Tree Yggdrasil for nine nights and days and at the end of that time, 'screaming took up the runes'. It was a ritual designed to give him wisdom and knowledge in the same way that plucking out his own eye and depositing it in the Well of Mimir gave him vision of the 'other world'.
The two primary forms of sacrifice to Odhinn were by hanging and burning. Cremation or submersion in a body of water rather than burial in the earth was common, but for followers of the Vanir, I would expect burial in the earth instead as they were earth gods.
At this point, this post consists really of notes to myself to be reviewed and consolidated later...
I was thinking early this morning about erotic strangling and its effects. Perhaps Odhinn's sacrifice was based on similar considerations, the altered state of consciousness prompted by the loss of breath, dizziness, even heightened sexual arousal. Furthermore, in support of this, the very name of Odhinn means breath. 'Od' is wind or breath and he carried the mead of inspiration in his mouth when he transformed to an eagle.
Elagabalus
xxxxxxxxx
What actually can be perceived as 'fact' and what as pure libel in the so-called history. Here is one achievement of this emperor that made him very unpopular:
As soon as he entered the city, however, neglecting all the affairs of the provinces, he established Elagabalus as a god on the Palatine Hill close to the imperial palace; and he built him a temple, to which he desired to transfer the emblem of the Great Mother, the fire of Vesta, the Palladium, the shields of the Salii, and all that the Romans held sacred, purposing that no god might be worshipped at Rome save only Elagabalus. He declared, furthermore, that the religions of the Jews and the Samaritans and the rites of the Christians must also be transferred to this place, in order that the priesthood of Elagabalus might include the mysteries of every form of worship.
Then, when he held his first audience with the senate, he gave orders that his mother should be asked to come into the senate-chamber. On her arrival she was invited to a place on the consuls' bench and there she took part in the drafting — that is to say, she witnessed the drawing up of the senate's decree.19 And Elagabalus was the only one of all the emperors under whom a woman attended the senate like a man, just as though she belonged to the senatorial order.
3 He also established a senaculum or women's senate, on the Quirinal Hill. Before his time, in fact, a congress of matrons had met here, but only on certain festivals, or whenever a matron was presented with the insignia of a 'consular marriage' — bestowed by the early emperors on their kinswomen, particularly on those whose husbands were not nobles, in order that they might not lose their noble rank.
What can be gleaned from all this? That he was extremely progressive, desiring that all mystery religions be combined into a single religion accessible to all. Second, that WOMEN should be given rights and power. He allowed his mother a place in the Senate and he established a senate for women.
Coins from the reign of Elagabalus. I own some silver coins like these but obviously do not own the gold one, which fetches an enormous price!
I am not that bothered by historical inaccuracies for the most part. They alter events in the interest of time and drama. What bothers me a little is the depiction of the religion of the Old North.
Last night, I watched the sacrifice made by Queen Lagertha wherein she used a curved scimitar to cut a beautiful young man through the breastbone.
There were a few elements of this that bothered me.
First of all, the God who was followed by most Warriors would have been Odhinn, whose method of sacrifice, including the sacrifice of Himself was hanging. The young man in this scene stands between two poles. He holds thongs or ropes on each of the poles but this is nothing like the old descriptions of sacrifice to Odhinn.
There are many bodies in museums that show ritual death by hanging and then placement in a body of water, usually a bog.
I do tend to subscribe to the theory that the Aesir were foreign invaders from the far East who brought their rites with them and that the Vanir were the native agrarian gods. Odhinn and Thor were members of the Aesir family of gods. Freyja, Freyr and Frigga were members of the Vanir.
Based on mystery religions throughout the world, I have come to the conclusion that one of the sacrificial rites practiced by followers of the Vanir would have been ritual castration. The Edda tells of Freyr's own sacrifice to the Giantess Gerd as a condition of his sacred marriage to her. The Giants were one of the elder races, powerful and primitive, equal to the Gods in their own way.
Freyr looked to the North and when he beheld the 'gleaming arms' of the beautiful giantess Gerd, he fell in love with her to the point where he became ill. He did not eat, drink or sleep. He journeyed north to her dwelling and she made it a condition of the marriage that he surrender his 'sword' to her.
One of the most ancient of mystery religions is that of the goddess Cybele and Attis. Cybele is, like Gerd, an ancient and powerful Goddess who dwells within the mountain, cave or rock. The traditional sacrifice to Cybele was voluntary castration. The man to be sacrificed would be bound to an evergreen, usually a pine tree, and then would have his genitals severed. He would become the tree and like the evergreen, which never loses its needles, would be reborn.
As in many Native American tribal traditions, the sacrifice of the male genitals was a means to gain freedom from gender. The individual then could be androgynous, neither man nor woman. Often the priests in Native American tribes, especially those of the Plains, would dress as women after this.
It is sad to me that the West has lost much of its focus in terms of the priority that once was given to spiritual gains above mere sexual gratification. Whenever I hear about individuals who want this or that in terms of 'gender' or 'sexual orientation', spiritual gains NEVER are mentioned. They want orgasms and a lifestyle that somehow satisfies them on a physical level, for whatever reason. The old sacrifices of genitalia or gender to the Mother Goddess were not an attempt to gain some sort of sexual climax at any price. They were 'sacrifices', something given for something greater. Attis died and was reborn through castration as were Adonis and the other gods of the ancient Fertile Crescent.
Some say that Heliogabalus or Elagabalus actually was an intensely spiritual follower of the ancient Mysteries... his name and reputation were blackened by the scurrilous political 'history' written about him and the other later Emperors. What was perceived as wanton lawless sexual behaviour may have been legitimate 'Eastern' practices.
Here is a link to the original text in English translation:
History of Elagabalus
In a very different sort of sacrifice, Odhinn hanged himself from the world Tree Yggdrasil for nine nights and days and at the end of that time, 'screaming took up the runes'. It was a ritual designed to give him wisdom and knowledge in the same way that plucking out his own eye and depositing it in the Well of Mimir gave him vision of the 'other world'.
The two primary forms of sacrifice to Odhinn were by hanging and burning. Cremation or submersion in a body of water rather than burial in the earth was common, but for followers of the Vanir, I would expect burial in the earth instead as they were earth gods.
At this point, this post consists really of notes to myself to be reviewed and consolidated later...
I was thinking early this morning about erotic strangling and its effects. Perhaps Odhinn's sacrifice was based on similar considerations, the altered state of consciousness prompted by the loss of breath, dizziness, even heightened sexual arousal. Furthermore, in support of this, the very name of Odhinn means breath. 'Od' is wind or breath and he carried the mead of inspiration in his mouth when he transformed to an eagle.
Elagabalus
xxxxxxxxx
What actually can be perceived as 'fact' and what as pure libel in the so-called history. Here is one achievement of this emperor that made him very unpopular:
As soon as he entered the city, however, neglecting all the affairs of the provinces, he established Elagabalus as a god on the Palatine Hill close to the imperial palace; and he built him a temple, to which he desired to transfer the emblem of the Great Mother, the fire of Vesta, the Palladium, the shields of the Salii, and all that the Romans held sacred, purposing that no god might be worshipped at Rome save only Elagabalus. He declared, furthermore, that the religions of the Jews and the Samaritans and the rites of the Christians must also be transferred to this place, in order that the priesthood of Elagabalus might include the mysteries of every form of worship.
Then, when he held his first audience with the senate, he gave orders that his mother should be asked to come into the senate-chamber. On her arrival she was invited to a place on the consuls' bench and there she took part in the drafting — that is to say, she witnessed the drawing up of the senate's decree.19 And Elagabalus was the only one of all the emperors under whom a woman attended the senate like a man, just as though she belonged to the senatorial order.
3 He also established a senaculum or women's senate, on the Quirinal Hill. Before his time, in fact, a congress of matrons had met here, but only on certain festivals, or whenever a matron was presented with the insignia of a 'consular marriage' — bestowed by the early emperors on their kinswomen, particularly on those whose husbands were not nobles, in order that they might not lose their noble rank.
What can be gleaned from all this? That he was extremely progressive, desiring that all mystery religions be combined into a single religion accessible to all. Second, that WOMEN should be given rights and power. He allowed his mother a place in the Senate and he established a senate for women.
Coins from the reign of Elagabalus. I own some silver coins like these but obviously do not own the gold one, which fetches an enormous price!
Sunday, July 2, 2017
The Tale of Ragnar Lodbrok
The name of Ragnar Lodbrok is familiar to many only from the recent series entitled 'The Vikings' but he was one of my heroes from childhood, mainly because of the manner of his death and his great courage and determination to honour the old gods.
I have enjoyed the series but it is no more accurate historically than the wonderful old film, 'The Vikings' from the 1950s. 'Viking' is not a tribe nor a people. It was a practice undertaken by warriors and farmers wherein, during specific seasons, they would take to their ships and raid foreign shores.
Here is the scene of the Death of Ragnar from the old film, 'The Vikings':
Death of Ragnar Lodbrok
And the classical scene and theme from the same film:
Arrival of the Longship
If any one is interested in watching this film in its entirety, it is available on DVD or on various platforms such as Amazon and Netflix I believe.
This film is as awe-inspiring in its way as 'Gone with the Wind'. It is as greatly loved and as fondly recalled.
As for the Vikings themselves, I do not believe that these warriors and farmers resembled bikers from our period, but some of the visuals in the recent series are quite impressive and memorable nonetheless. I understand why the creators of the series equated Vikings with contemporary bikers to some extent. They were individualists and based their ethics when raiding upon considerations of bravery and personal loyalty rather than any principles of human rights or compassion towards strangers.
When looking at the culture that produced the 'Viking' tradition, you have to understand that these people lived in a harsh landscape, farming on a land of poor soil and very cruel climate. They went 'a Viking' to supplement a life that often gave little beyond the bare necessities if even that.
During this period, their targets often were invaders themselves who had taken possession of land that originally did not belong to them either. After all, both the Angles and the Saxons were foreign invaders who came to Britain looking for better soil and an easier life.
Here is the tale of his life from the original Icelandic saga:
Ragnar was the son of King Hring and after his death, he assumed power in Sweden and Denmark. Many rival rulers felt he was unfit to govern because of his youth. A jarl in West Gautland named Herraud was a vassal of King Ragnar with a daughter named Thora Hart-of-the-Town. She was very beautiful and desired by many.
As a child, her father had given her a baby snake as a pet. She kept it in a box when it was small but it grew and grew until it was so large that it coiled round her bower and bit its own tail. (This is the description of the worm Ouroboros that encircled the earth at the bottom of the sea and with whom the God Thor fought.). It was so fierce and monstrous that all began to fear it. It consumed an ox each day and the servants who had to feed it were terrified of it.
At the bragarfull, the ceremony of the Ruler’s Cup, the jarl made a solemn oath that he would give his daughter Thora in marriage to the man who was able to slay the great serpent or even any man who would dare to brave the serpent in order to speak to her in her bower.
King Ragnar heard about this and decided to go to West Gautland to try his luck with the monstrous creature. When he neared the jarl’s dwelling place, he donned shaggy garments consisting of fur trousers, cloak with sleeves and a hood. The clothes were treated with sand and tar. In his hand, he held a great spear and his sword was on his belt and in this fashion, he walked alone to Thora’s bower.
He drew his sword and slew the serpent, beheading it. As promised, he was given the hand of Thora Hart-of-the-Town in marriage.
After this, he went often to war until he had liberated the entire kingdom. He had two sons with Thora: Eirik and Agnar. When the boys still were children, Thora became seriously ill and died.
Ragnar then married his second wife, Aslaug, called Randalin by some. She was reputed to be the daughter of Sigurd, Fafnir’s Bane with Brynhild, Budli’s daughter. They had four sons. Ivar, called ‘the Boneless’ was the eldest, followed by Bjorn Ironside, Hvitserk and finally Sigurd. Sigurd was called ‘Sigurd Snake in the Eye’ because he had a mark inside his eye that appeared in the form of a serpent encircling the pupil.
When Ragnar’s sons were fully grown, they went raiding throughout the world. The eldest brothers Eirik and Agnar, both sons by Thora, were second in rank only to Ragnar himself and Ivar with his brothers third. Ivar became their leader not only because he was eldest but because he was the cleverest of his brothers. Together, they conquered Zealand, Reidgotaland, Gotland, Oland and all the smaller islands in the northern sea.
Ivar then assumed the rulership of Hleidargard in Zealand with his younger brothers but this enraged their father who did not want to see his own sons gain more fame and repute than their father. He therefore made a man named Eystein Beli king of Upper Sweden and told him to guard the realm for him against all odds and all comers, including his own sons if need be.
One summer, after Ragnar had sailed east over the Baltic Sea with his warriors, Eirik and Agnar, his sons, sailed to Sweden, bringing their ships into Lake Malaren. They then sent word to King Eystein in Uppsala, requesting a meeting. Eirik told the King that he wanted Eystein to govern Sweden under the authority of the sons of Ragnar and not Ragnar himself. He asked for the hand of Borghild, Eystein’s daughter in marriage, declaring that they together could hold the kingdom against Ragnar and any army and allies he could muster.
Eystein would not make a decision hastily and moreover stated that all the chieftains of Sweden had to be in agreement with the plan before he would set his seal upon it. When the matter was raised, the chieftains were unanimous in their determination to remain true to Ragnar by defending the land against his sons. They brought together an overwhelming host and King Eystein then marched against Eirik and Agnar. A great battle was fought then and Lodbrok’s sons were defeated. So many fell on the field that few of the host of Ragnar’s sons were left standing. Agnar fell and Eirik himself was captured.
King Eystein then offered terms to Erik, including as much of the wealth of Uppsala as he wished in compensation for the death of his brother Agnar as well as the hand of his daughter Borghild in marriage. Erik declared that he wanted no such compensation, nor did he want Borghild now. He could not accept life on any terms after such as great defeat but he would accept the boon of being able to choose the day and manner of his own death for himself. King Eystein was unable to persuade him to accept anything else and therefore agreed to Eirik’s last request.
And this is the manner of death that Eirik chose for himself: for his warriors to pierce his body with their spearpoints and so lift him up above all the others who had been slain.
Eirik then chanted: ‘I care not, you killer dog, to hear any of your offers. I want not your daughter. To mourn me I have no mother. Make haste, men, to impale me here! I will die over my own host hoisted, highest of the slain!’
(To be continued)
I have enjoyed the series but it is no more accurate historically than the wonderful old film, 'The Vikings' from the 1950s. 'Viking' is not a tribe nor a people. It was a practice undertaken by warriors and farmers wherein, during specific seasons, they would take to their ships and raid foreign shores.
Here is the scene of the Death of Ragnar from the old film, 'The Vikings':
Death of Ragnar Lodbrok
And the classical scene and theme from the same film:
Arrival of the Longship
If any one is interested in watching this film in its entirety, it is available on DVD or on various platforms such as Amazon and Netflix I believe.
This film is as awe-inspiring in its way as 'Gone with the Wind'. It is as greatly loved and as fondly recalled.
As for the Vikings themselves, I do not believe that these warriors and farmers resembled bikers from our period, but some of the visuals in the recent series are quite impressive and memorable nonetheless. I understand why the creators of the series equated Vikings with contemporary bikers to some extent. They were individualists and based their ethics when raiding upon considerations of bravery and personal loyalty rather than any principles of human rights or compassion towards strangers.
When looking at the culture that produced the 'Viking' tradition, you have to understand that these people lived in a harsh landscape, farming on a land of poor soil and very cruel climate. They went 'a Viking' to supplement a life that often gave little beyond the bare necessities if even that.
During this period, their targets often were invaders themselves who had taken possession of land that originally did not belong to them either. After all, both the Angles and the Saxons were foreign invaders who came to Britain looking for better soil and an easier life.
Here is the tale of his life from the original Icelandic saga:
Ragnar was the son of King Hring and after his death, he assumed power in Sweden and Denmark. Many rival rulers felt he was unfit to govern because of his youth. A jarl in West Gautland named Herraud was a vassal of King Ragnar with a daughter named Thora Hart-of-the-Town. She was very beautiful and desired by many.
As a child, her father had given her a baby snake as a pet. She kept it in a box when it was small but it grew and grew until it was so large that it coiled round her bower and bit its own tail. (This is the description of the worm Ouroboros that encircled the earth at the bottom of the sea and with whom the God Thor fought.). It was so fierce and monstrous that all began to fear it. It consumed an ox each day and the servants who had to feed it were terrified of it.
At the bragarfull, the ceremony of the Ruler’s Cup, the jarl made a solemn oath that he would give his daughter Thora in marriage to the man who was able to slay the great serpent or even any man who would dare to brave the serpent in order to speak to her in her bower.
King Ragnar heard about this and decided to go to West Gautland to try his luck with the monstrous creature. When he neared the jarl’s dwelling place, he donned shaggy garments consisting of fur trousers, cloak with sleeves and a hood. The clothes were treated with sand and tar. In his hand, he held a great spear and his sword was on his belt and in this fashion, he walked alone to Thora’s bower.
He drew his sword and slew the serpent, beheading it. As promised, he was given the hand of Thora Hart-of-the-Town in marriage.
After this, he went often to war until he had liberated the entire kingdom. He had two sons with Thora: Eirik and Agnar. When the boys still were children, Thora became seriously ill and died.
Ragnar then married his second wife, Aslaug, called Randalin by some. She was reputed to be the daughter of Sigurd, Fafnir’s Bane with Brynhild, Budli’s daughter. They had four sons. Ivar, called ‘the Boneless’ was the eldest, followed by Bjorn Ironside, Hvitserk and finally Sigurd. Sigurd was called ‘Sigurd Snake in the Eye’ because he had a mark inside his eye that appeared in the form of a serpent encircling the pupil.
When Ragnar’s sons were fully grown, they went raiding throughout the world. The eldest brothers Eirik and Agnar, both sons by Thora, were second in rank only to Ragnar himself and Ivar with his brothers third. Ivar became their leader not only because he was eldest but because he was the cleverest of his brothers. Together, they conquered Zealand, Reidgotaland, Gotland, Oland and all the smaller islands in the northern sea.
Ivar then assumed the rulership of Hleidargard in Zealand with his younger brothers but this enraged their father who did not want to see his own sons gain more fame and repute than their father. He therefore made a man named Eystein Beli king of Upper Sweden and told him to guard the realm for him against all odds and all comers, including his own sons if need be.
One summer, after Ragnar had sailed east over the Baltic Sea with his warriors, Eirik and Agnar, his sons, sailed to Sweden, bringing their ships into Lake Malaren. They then sent word to King Eystein in Uppsala, requesting a meeting. Eirik told the King that he wanted Eystein to govern Sweden under the authority of the sons of Ragnar and not Ragnar himself. He asked for the hand of Borghild, Eystein’s daughter in marriage, declaring that they together could hold the kingdom against Ragnar and any army and allies he could muster.
Eystein would not make a decision hastily and moreover stated that all the chieftains of Sweden had to be in agreement with the plan before he would set his seal upon it. When the matter was raised, the chieftains were unanimous in their determination to remain true to Ragnar by defending the land against his sons. They brought together an overwhelming host and King Eystein then marched against Eirik and Agnar. A great battle was fought then and Lodbrok’s sons were defeated. So many fell on the field that few of the host of Ragnar’s sons were left standing. Agnar fell and Eirik himself was captured.
King Eystein then offered terms to Erik, including as much of the wealth of Uppsala as he wished in compensation for the death of his brother Agnar as well as the hand of his daughter Borghild in marriage. Erik declared that he wanted no such compensation, nor did he want Borghild now. He could not accept life on any terms after such as great defeat but he would accept the boon of being able to choose the day and manner of his own death for himself. King Eystein was unable to persuade him to accept anything else and therefore agreed to Eirik’s last request.
And this is the manner of death that Eirik chose for himself: for his warriors to pierce his body with their spearpoints and so lift him up above all the others who had been slain.
Eirik then chanted: ‘I care not, you killer dog, to hear any of your offers. I want not your daughter. To mourn me I have no mother. Make haste, men, to impale me here! I will die over my own host hoisted, highest of the slain!’
(To be continued)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)